Home RSS
Real Estate
Cars

Property disputes dog Vatican-Israel ties

AFP
Property disputes dog Vatican-Israel ties - Israel - Property - Dispute


Israeli and Vatican lawyers have been disputing ownership of land occupied by a Catholic charity in Jerusalem for 35 years -- just one of many longstanding property issues that form an uneasy backdrop to Pope Benedict XVI's visit to Israel next week.



The Hospice of the Daughters of Charity of St Vincent de Paul cares for scores of Palestinians with severe physical and mental handicaps and operates a kindergarten for disadvantaged children.

But Israeli developers have long been interested in the sprawling site sitting on prime real estate just outside the Old City Christian quarter walls.

Although a 1993 bilateral agreement defines its convent and church as "holy places" entitled to protection, successive Israeli governments have refused to give the accord the force of law.

Signed on December 30, 1993, the so-called Fundamental Agreement enshrined a historic rapprochement between Israel and the Vatican and set up a joint commission to resolve the Church's financial and real estate issues, notably in territory occupied by the Jewish state after 1967.

"Nothing is concluded, it is just an ongoing discussion about these vital, crucial and sensitive issues," said Pierbattista Pizzaballa, "custodian" of Church sites in Israel.

The joint commission, which had been asked to complete its work within two years of the 1993 accord's signing, did not meet at all between 1994 and 2004.

Resumed in 2004, the negotiations have sputtered along. Last month two meetings took place in "an atmosphere of great cordiality and in a spirit of cooperation," according to a joint communique.

The second meeting on April 30 in Jerusalem produced "meaningful progress", the participants said, but the next meeting will not take place until December 10, at the Vatican.


Source








 
_________________________________________________________________________
 
Disclaimer: The information presented and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Estates Report and/or its partners.